Silver's Historic Breakout

How a Convergence of Geopolitics, Supply Shocks, and Institutional Reversals Propelled Silver into Uncharted Territory

Executive Summary

In the nineteen days since December 26, 2025, silver has executed one of the most dramatic price moves in commodities history. The white metal surged 18.7% from $77.32 to a record-breaking $91.78 per ounce, shattering the psychological $90 barrier for the first time in recorded trading history source. This represents a 206.95% year-over-year gain compared to January 14, 2025 source.

The surge stems from a convergence of three structural forces: China’s January 1 implementation of strict export controls on refined silver that restrict the country’s dominant refining capacity, JPMorgan’s historic reversal from massive short positions to approximately 196 million ounces net long in COMEX futures, and extreme physical-paper market divergences including reported spot transactions at premiums as high as $130 per ounce in Asian and Middle Eastern trading hubs—approximately 82% above COMEX futures source.

1. Background

1.1 China’s Strategic Pivot on Silver Exports

On January 1, 2026, the People’s Republic of China implemented a sweeping transformation in how silver flows to global markets. The Ministry of Commerce elevated silver from ordinary commodity status to “strategic dual-use” material, placing it under the same regulatory framework as rare earth elements source. The new dual-license system replaced the previous quota regime that had governed Chinese silver exports since 2000.

Under this framework, only 44 companies received authorization to export silver for the 2026-2027 period—just two more than in 2025 source. Export volumes were reportedly reduced by up to 40% compared to the previous year, with exports below a state-defined minimum price effectively banned source.

This policy matters because China controls 60% to 70% of global silver refining capacity, though its role is more nuanced than simple export/import figures suggest. China exports refined silver (estimated 4,600+ tons in the first eleven months of 2025) while simultaneously importing substantial quantities of doré (silver-rich sludge and concentrates) for processing source. The country’s dominance stems from its position as the world’s second-largest silver miner combined with its overwhelming lead in midstream refining operations. When doré imports are included, China directly or indirectly controls an estimated 60-70% of global silver flows. The new licensing restrictions create a refining bottleneck at precisely the moment when the market faces five consecutive years of structural deficits, as alternative non-Chinese refining capacity cannot quickly scale to meet demand source.

1.2 The JPMorgan Position Flip

Perhaps the most stunning development occurred in late December 2025 when market analysis indicated that JPMorgan Chase—historically one of the largest holders of short positions in COMEX silver futures—executed a significant position reversal source. Banks had paid $1.3 billion in silver manipulation settlements between 2008 and 2023, with JPMorgan’s nearly $1 billion fine in 2020 representing the largest single penalty source.

According to position estimates from late December 2025, JPMorgan’s COMEX proprietary and brokerage positions shifted to approximately 196 million ounces net long source. This represents a dramatic shift from providing liquidity through short sales to standing for physical delivery. Some analyses have incorrectly included JPMorgan’s role as custodian for the iShares Silver Trust (SLV), which holds approximately 517 million ounces, as part of the bank’s proprietary position. This is a conceptual error—as custodian, JPMorgan merely stores SLV’s silver on behalf of ETF investors and does not control or own that metal directionally. The actual JPMorgan position reversal is reflected in their COMEX trading book, not custodial holdings.

The January 7, 2026 COMEX delivery notices provided confirmation of this strategy shift. JPMorgan issued 1,608 contracts out of 1,624 total January deliveries—99% of all notices—representing approximately 8.04 million ounces source. Month-to-date deliveries through January 12 reached 2,578 contracts (12.89M oz), marking record high delivery volumes for a typically inactive January contract source.

1.3 Physical-Paper Market Divergence

The structural fracture between paper derivatives and physical reality reached historic proportions in January 2026. By January 2, reports from trading hubs including Tokyo and Dubai indicated spot transactions at premiums as high as $130 per ounce—an 82% premium over COMEX futures which were quoting approximately $71.50 at the time source. These reported transactions require careful interpretation: they may include smaller-scale coin shop or retail purchases that typically carry premiums over bulk spot prices, rather than large-scale industrial bullion trades. However, the magnitude of reported premiums suggests significant physical market stress and potential breakdown in traditional arbitrage mechanisms.

This divergence occurred against a backdrop of collapsing Western vault inventories. COMEX registered silver (available for delivery) has declined more than 70% since its 2020 peak, falling from approximately 346M oz to the current range of 82-127.6M oz source. The December 1-4, 2025 period saw the most dramatic vault drainage in commodity exchange history when 47.6 million ounces were claimed from COMEX warehouses—60% of registered inventory in just four days source.

The global paper-to-physical ratio has expanded to approximately 356:1, with COMEX open interest representing roughly 300 times more silver than physically exists in vaults source. March 2026 COMEX futures open interest reached 151,000 lots (755 million ounces) against only 455 million ounces in COMEX warehouses source.

2. Key Drivers

Driver	Evidence & Sources
China export controls restricting ~60-70% of global refining capacity	CNBC, Discovery Alert
JPMorgan COMEX position reversal to ~196M oz net long	Substack analysis
Reported physical premiums up to 82% over COMEX futures (retail/coin shop transactions)	Market Minute
COMEX inventory drawdown 70%+ since 2020	Navnoorbawa
Record January deliveries (12.89M oz month-to-date)	CME Delivery Report
Gold-silver ratio compression to 56.6:1 from 100:1 in early 2025	Discovery Alert
CME margin hikes (+47% to $32,500/contract) attempting to cool volatility	MarketWatch
US Commerce Dept Section 232 investigation complete; Trump directs negotiations on PCMDPs	White House Proclamation

3. Implications

3.1 Short-term Outlook (Next 12-24 Months)

The immediate term presents both opportunity and extreme risk. Silver futures volatility reached historic levels in December 2025, with the CVOL gauge hitting 81.71 on December 28 source. The Chicago Mercantile Exchange responded with two margin hikes in one week, increasing maintenance requirements from $22,000 to $32,500 per 5,000-ounce contract—a total increase of nearly 50% source.

On January 14, 2026, CME further altered its margin methodology from fixed dollar amounts to percentage-based pricing, setting silver margins at 9% of contract notional value source. This means margins will now automatically rise and fall with price movements, creating a self-reinforcing volatility loop.

Price targets from major institutions diverge dramatically. Deutsche Bank forecasts silver to average approximately $55 per ounce in 2026 source. Independent analyst Michael Oliver has forecast silver reaching $200 by Q2 2026 source. Meanwhile, ANZ Bank strategist Soni Kumari acknowledged on January 13, 2026 that volatility remains elevated while noting the structural supply-demand imbalance continues supporting prices source.

The G7 finance ministers meeting on January 12, 2026, in Washington discussed coordinated responses including price floors for strategic minerals and pooled investment mechanisms source. While focused initially on rare earth elements, frameworks discussed could extend to silver given both US and China have now designated it as strategic.

3.2 Medium-term Outlook (2-5 Years)

The structural shifts occurring in early 2026 suggest the silver market has entered a new paradigm. On January 14, 2026, President Trump issued a proclamation following completion of the US Commerce Department’s Section 232 investigation into processed critical minerals and their derivative products (PCMDPs) source. The Secretary of Commerce found that PCMDPs are being imported in quantities and circumstances that threaten to impair national security. Trump directed the Commerce Department and USTR to negotiate agreements with trading partners to address this threat, with potential remedies including minimum import prices for specific critical minerals source. Silver was added to the US critical minerals list in 2025, placing it within the scope of this investigation.

Exchange for Physical (EFP) pricing as of January 7, 2026 indicates market expectations for silver tariffs around 5.5% source. If significant tariffs or minimum import prices are imposed on silver, this could create a “two-tier market” between US and other regional markets source. Combined with China’s export licensing system, the result would be a fragmented global market where pricing power increasingly shifts from Western exchanges (COMEX/LBMA) to Eastern markets (Shanghai Gold Exchange, Dubai).

Industrial demand fundamentals remain extraordinarily robust. Solar PV installations require approximately 20g of silver per kilowatt, with 15-20% growth projected for 2025 source. Electric vehicles use 25-50 ounces of silver per unit compared to just 1-2 ounces for internal combustion engine vehicles. The AI/data center boom is driving demand through silver-plated heat exchangers and 5G infrastructure deployment.

Metals Focus forecasted a fifth straight annual silver supply deficit in 2025 at 63.4 million ounces, with deficits projected to persist but ease somewhat to 30.5 million ounces in 2026 source. These structural deficits are occurring against a backdrop of declining mine production, which peaked at 896M oz in 2016 and fell to approximately 813M oz in 2024.

3.3 Risks & Counter-forces

Several significant risks threaten the sustainability of current price levels:

1. Resolution of US-China trade tensions: The November 2025 framework agreement saw China suspend export controls on seven categories of rare earth-related items until November 10, 2026 source. While silver was not covered by those concessions, the agreement demonstrates willingness to make limited strategic mineral concessions.

2. CME margin escalation: The January 14, 2026 shift to percentage-based margins means further price increases will automatically raise margin requirements source. This could force additional liquidations of leveraged long positions.

3. Supply response from miners: Higher prices could stimulate new mine development and increased production from existing operations, potentially alleviating supply constraints over the medium term.

4. ETF redemption pressures: The Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) was trading at a 3.39% discount to net asset value on January 9, 2026 source, suggesting some investors may be rotating out of physical exposure despite the rally.

5. Basel III banking regulations: Effective January 1, 2026 in Europe, new capital rules are forcing banks to reassess unallocated paper silver holdings source. While this currently supports physical demand, it could also reduce liquidity in paper markets.

4. Strategic Outlook

The events of December 2025 and January 2026 represent nothing less than a fundamental restructuring of the global silver market. For decades, London and New York served as the undisputed centers of price discovery for precious metals. Now, multiple pricing regimes are emerging: COMEX quoting $71-92 per ounce while Shanghai trades at $78-80 with premiums of $5-$8, and reported physical transactions in Asian and Middle Eastern trading hubs reaching premiums as high as $130 source. These reported high-premium transactions may reflect smaller-scale retail or coin shop purchases rather than bulk industrial bullion trades, but indicate significant market fragmentation and stress on traditional arbitrage mechanisms.

Analysts are increasingly warning that Western exchanges could lose their status as sole benchmarks for global pricing, with potential transfer of pricing power to Shanghai by mid-2026 source. This would represent the first major shift in precious metals price discovery since the London Gold Pool’s collapse in 1968.

The CFTC Bank Participation Report from December 2, 2025 shows 22 banks holding net short positions of approximately 211.6 million ounces (42,311 contracts) source. However, the divergence between U.S. banks (which largely exited shorts following JPMorgan’s lead) and non-U.S. banks (17 non-U.S. banks remain heavily short at ~215M oz net) suggests the squeeze pressure is increasingly concentrated on European and Asian institutions.

Mainstream media coverage has evolved from reporting record-breaking prices to analyzing the broader implications. The Wall Street Journal noted on December 27, 2025: “At $76.486, a troy ounce of silver is worth more than a barrel of oil in futures markets” source. Elon Musk warned on December 29, 2025: “This is not good. Silver is needed in many industrial processes” source.

5. Strategic Outlook: Price Forecast for January 2027

Based on the structural developments documented above, a reasoned twelve-month forward view requires weighing durable supply constraints against potential offsets from demand destruction and policy responses.

The Bullish Foundation

Three factors are unlikely to reverse in the next twelve months:

1. China’s export controls represent a structural shift, not a temporary measure – Beijing elevated silver to “strategic dual-use” status alongside rare earth elements. The two-year licensing period covering 2026-2027 suggests this policy is calibrated for medium-term strategic advantage, not short-term posturing. Even if US-China relations thaw somewhat, China has demonstrated willingness to weaponize strategic mineral supply (the January 8, 2026 rare earth restrictions on Japan confirm this pattern). Removing these controls would require Beijing to concede leverage it has spent years building.

2. Industrial demand from electrification and AI is secular, not cyclical – Solar PV installations grew 15-20% in 2025 and require ~20g silver per kilowatt. Electric vehicle adoption continues accelerating, with each EV consuming 25-50 ounces versus 1-2 ounces for internal combustion vehicles. AI data center construction shows no signs of slowing, and these facilities require silver-plated heat exchangers. These demand drivers respond to long-term decarbonization and digitalization trends, not short-term price signals. Higher silver prices might modestly slow adoption curves but will not reverse them.

3. Physical inventory depletion requires years to reverse – COMEX registered inventories declined 70% since their 2020 peak. Even if mining production increases, bringing new primary silver mines online typically requires 5-7 years from discovery to commercial production. Byproduct mining (70% of silver supply) is constrained by primary metals markets like copper and lead. The structural deficits identified by Metals Focus—63.4M oz in 2025, projected 30.5M oz in 2026—persist because supply elasticity is fundamentally limited.

The Bearish Counterweights

Three factors could dampen or reverse price momentum:

1. Demand destruction at elevated prices – Silver is not perfectly inelastic. At $91.78 per ounce, jewelry demand and some industrial applications face substitution pressure. The solar industry has developed silver-reduced cell technologies (PERC to TOPCon transitions reduce silver loading by ~30-40%). If prices remain elevated, substitution accelerates. However, these processes take time to scale and cannot absorb current supply shortages in the near term.

2. Policy responses from Western governments – The G7 January 12, 2026 meeting discussing strategic mineral stockpiles and price floors represents recognition that Western nations are exposed to Chinese leverage. Potential responses include: accelerating domestic mining (the 13 fast-tracked US projects under Executive Order 14157), subsidizing recycling, or establishing strategic reserves. These measures could alleviate supply constraints but require 2-5 years to materialize at meaningful scale.

3. Market structure risks from paper market fragmentation – The current environment—Tokyo/Dubai physical at $130 versus COMEX futures at ~$92—is unsustainable. Either physical premiums collapse as arbitrage increases, or paper markets lose credibility and participants migrate to Eastern exchanges. Either scenario involves volatility. If Western paper prices become irrelevant, liquidity could dry up and price discovery becomes chaotic.

Prediction: Silver at $120-$140 by January 2027

Base case: $130 per ounce (41% above current levels)

This projection assumes China’s export controls remain in place through 2026, the US Commerce Department Section 232 investigation results in some form of tariff or trade measures (likely 5-10% given EFP pricing indications), and industrial demand continues growing at mid-single-digit rates despite elevated prices.

Under this scenario, the current physical scarcity premium partially normalizes as arbitrage improves—Tokyo/Dubai $130 pricing converges closer to Western benchmarks—but the scarcity premium doesn’t disappear. Physical inventories continue declining toward critical levels, forcing more participants to stand for delivery and creating sustained backwardation.

The gold-silver ratio could compress further toward 50:1 from the current 56.6:1 if gold stabilizes around $5,000-5,500 while silver outperforms. This supports a price level of approximately $100-110 just from ratio mechanics, with additional upside coming from continued supply-demand imbalances.

Bullish case: $160+ per ounce (requires multiple factors aligning)

• Escalating US-China tensions leading to additional strategic mineral restrictions
• Significant physical delivery defaults or near-defaults on COMEX/LBMA
• Central banks adding silver to reserves (currently they hold only gold)
• Major ETF inflows as institutional investors rotate from paper to physical exposure
• Supply disruptions from mining labor strikes or geopolitical issues

This scenario has low probability but non-zero tail risk given the current market structure.

Bearish case: $70-85 per ounce (requires negative shocks)

• Resolution of US-China tensions with reciprocal easing of export controls
• Aggressive CME margin hikes triggering forced liquidation cascade
• Breakthrough silver-reduction technologies in solar applications scaling rapidly
• Global economic recession reducing industrial demand significantly
• Major silver mine expansions or new discoveries coming online faster than expected

Rationale for Base Case Projection

The $130 base case rests on a core insight: the current situation is not speculative froth but structural realignment. When China controls 60-70% of global refining capacity and explicitly chooses to restrict exports, price becomes a function of geopolitical leverage rather than traditional commodity economics. This dynamic resembles the 1970s oil market after OPEC’s production restraint policies, not a typical commodity boom-bust cycle.

The JPMorgan position flip to net long exposure on COMEX is telling. Banks do not typically abandon decades of market-making strategies without conviction that structural conditions have changed fundamentally. Their standing for delivery (8.04M oz on January 7 alone) suggests institutional recognition that physical scarcity is the new baseline. This shift in proprietary trading positions, separate from their custodial role for ETF holdings like SLV, indicates banks are positioning themselves to benefit from physical supply constraints.

The paper-to-physical ratio of 356:1, while often cited as evidence of manipulation or fragility, actually represents structural risk to the downside for paper shorts. If even 5% of open interest holders stand for delivery, the physical market cannot fulfill obligations without extreme price rationing. This creates asymmetric upside risk relative to downside.

Most importantly, the timeline for resolving supply constraints exceeds twelve months. Even with optimal policy responses and mining investment, bringing new silver production online requires years. Demand from energy transition and digital infrastructure continues growing regardless of price levels in the relevant planning horizons for these sectors.

Therefore, absent a major geopolitical de-escalation or technological breakthrough in silver substitution, the path of least resistance for prices remains upward. Volatility will persist—CME margin methodology changes guarantee periodic corrections—but the directionality favors continued appreciation.

6. Conclusion

Silver’s historic breakout above $90 per ounce on January 14, 2026, represents the culmination of structural forces years in the making. Five consecutive years of supply deficits, evolving industrial demand from green energy and AI applications, geopolitical competition over strategic minerals, and the collapse of physical inventories created a tinderbox waiting for ignition.

That ignition came from China’s January 1 export controls and JPMorgan’s position flip to net long exposure. The result has been extreme price volatility, regional market fragmentation, and the breakdown of traditional arbitrage mechanisms that once kept physical and paper prices in rough alignment.

For investors, the current environment presents both extraordinary opportunity and unprecedented risk. The same structural supply constraints that drove prices from $29 to over $90 in thirteen months could persist for years, particularly if US-China tensions escalate and trade restrictions on strategic minerals remain in place. However, the extreme volatility demonstrated by CME margin hikes and flash crashes makes timing challenging even when direction is favorable.

What seems increasingly clear is that the silver market of early 2026 bears little resemblance to its historical patterns. The combination of strategic designation by both the US and China, relentless physical demand from industrial applications, and evolving institutional positioning suggests we have entered a new era where silver is viewed not merely as a precious metal or industrial commodity, but as strategic material central to geopolitical competition and technological advancement.

The coming months will determine whether this transition results in sustained price discovery at higher levels or volatility persists as markets adjust to new paradigms. Based on current structural conditions, a reasonable twelve-month outlook targets $130 per ounce by January 2027—acknowledging both the potential for higher outcomes if geopolitical tensions escalate and downside risks if policy responses accelerate faster than anticipated.

Either way, January 2026 will likely be remembered as the moment when silver’s role in the global financial system underwent a fundamental transformation.

---

Sources:

1. Fortune, “Current Price of Silver,” January 14, 2026 – https://fortune.com/article/current-price-of-silver-1-14-2026/
2. Fortune, “Current Price of Silver,” January 13, 2026 – https://fortune.com/article/current-price-of-silver-1-13-2026/
3. Market Minute, “The Great Silver Disconnect: Physical Prices Hit $130 as Paper Markets Face Systemic Liquidity Crisis,” January 2, 2026 – https://markets.financialcontent.com/gatehouse.rrstar/article/marketminute-2026-1-2-the-great-silver-disconnect-physical-prices-hit-130-as-paper-markets-face-systemic-liquidity-crisis
4. CNBC, “China Silver Export Controls 2026 US Economy Prices Rare Earths Critical Minerals XAG Metals,” December 31, 2025 – https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/31/china-silver-export-controls-2026-us-economy-prices-rare-earths-critical-minerals-xag-metals.html
5. Discovery Alert, “China Silver Export Restrictions Reshape Markets 2026,” January 2026 – https://discoveryalert.com.au/china-silver-export-restrictions-reshape-markets-2026/
6. Discovery Alert, “Strategic Mineral Export Controls China Silver 2025,” – https://discoveryalert.com.au/strategic-mineral-export-controls-china-silver-2025/
7. Gerrards Bullion, “China’s Silver Squeeze: The New Rules of the Game for UK Investors,” January 2026 – https://gerrardsbullion.com/invest/chinas-silver-squeeze-the-new-rules-of-the-game-for-uk-investors/
8. Spar Gold, “China Silver Export Ban 2026 Involution Crisis,” January 2026 – https://spar.gold/en/blog/articles/china-silver-export-ban-2026-involution-crisis
9. Navnoorbawa Substack, “Eight Banks Paid $1.3B for Silver Manipulation,” December 2025 – https://navnoorbawa.substack.com/p/eight-banks-paid-13b-for-silver-manipulation
10. Jensen David Substack, “Suddenly a COMEX Silver Delivery,” January 7, 2026 – https://jensendavid.substack.com/p/suddenly-a-comex-silver-delivery
11. CME Group, “Metals Issues and Stops Report,” January 2026 – https://www.cmegroup.com/delivery_reports/MetalsIssuesAndStopsReport.pdf
12. FXStreet, “A Perfect Storm of Policy Supply and Industrial Demand: The Great Silver Squeeze of 2026,” December 28, 2025 – https://www.fxstreet.com/analysis/a-perfect-storm-of-policy-supply-and-industrial-demand-the-great-silver-squeeze-of-2026-202512282335
13. JJ745 Substack, “Evening Wrap January 13,” January 13, 2026 – https://jj745.substack.com/p/evening-wrap-january-13
14. Discovery Alert, “Precious Metals 2026 Rally Gold Silver Demand,” January 2026 – https://discoveryalert.com.au/precious-metals-2026-rally-gold-silver-demand/
15. MarketWatch, “Silver Is Getting More Expensive to Trade But It Could Still Hit $100—Here’s How,” January 14, 2026 – https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20260114182/silver-is-getting-more-expensive-to-trade-but-it-could-still-hit-100-heres-how
16. White House, “A Proclamation: Adjusting Imports of Processed Critical Minerals and Their Derivative Products into the United States,” January 14, 2026 – https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/01/adjusting-imports-of-processed-critical-minerals-and-their-derivative-products-into-the-united-states/
17. White House, “Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Directs Negotiations to Adjust Imports of Processed Critical Minerals and Their Derivative Products into the United States,” January 14, 2026 – https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2026/01/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-directs-negotiations-to-adjust-imports-of-processed-critical-minerals-and-their-derivative-products-into-the-united-states/
18. ABC News, “Surging Silver, Gold Slide After CME Raises Margin,” December 29, 2025 – https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/surging-silver-gold-slide-after-cme-raises-margin-128752589
19. Seeking Alpha, “Silver Will Pass the Latest Margin Hike Test,” December 2025 – https://seekingalpha.com/article/4857176-silver-will-pass-the-latest-margin-hike-test
20. InvestorNews, “The Critical Minerals Report 01-11-2026: The World’s Scramble for Critical Minerals Enters a New Phase,” January 11, 2026 – https://investornews.com/critical-minerals-rare-earths/the-critical-minerals-report-01-11-2026-the-worlds-scramble-for-critical-minerals-enters-a-new-phase/
21. Mining.com, “Silver Price Nears $90 as Record Run Continues,” January 13, 2026 – https://www.mining.com/silver-price-nears-90-as-record-run-continues/
22. Sprott, “Gold & Silver Outlook 2026,” January 2026 – https://sprott.com/insights/gold-silver-outlook-2026/
23. Kitco, “Precious Metals Surge to Record Highs Amid Political Turbulence and Institutional,” January 12, 2026 – https://www.kitco.com/opinion/2026-01-12/precious-metals-surge-record-highs-amid-political-turbulence-and-institutional
24. Investing.com, “Silver’s Greatest Short Squeeze Ever: The Perfect Storm of 2026,” January 2026 – https://www.investing.com/analysis/silvers-greatest-short-squeeze-ever-the-perfect-storm-of-2026-200672893
25. Congressional Research Service, R48549, “Trump Administration Trade Actions,” January 2026 – https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/R/PDF/R48549/R48549.12.pdf
26. JD Supra, “The Current Landscape of Section 232 Investigations,” January 2026 – https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-current-landscape-of-section-232-1772053/
27. Wall Street Journal, “An Ounce of Silver Is Now Worth More Than a Barrel of Oil,” December 27, 2025 – https://www.wsj.com/finance/commodities-futures/an-ounce-of-silver-is-now-worth-more-than-a-barrel-of-oil-196e149e
28. Yahoo Finance, “Musk Warns on Record Silver Prices Amid China Supply Fears,” December 29, 2025 – https://finance.yahoo.com/news/musk-warns-record-silver-prices-131228966.html
29. Miles Franklin Media YouTube, “Top Trader Forecasts Gold & Silver for 2026 – Gareth Soloway,” December 28, 2025 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uitA8tUhO9w
30. LinkedIn, Suman Bahl, “Silver Analysis from the 1st,” January 2026 – https://www.linkedin.com/posts/suman-bahl_silver-analysis-from-the-1st-activity-7412478086623080448-ckpF
31. Sprott, “Investment Strategies: Exchange Listed Products Physical Bullion Funds Silver,” January 9, 2026 – https://sprott.com/investment-strategies/exchange-listed-products/physical-bullion-funds/silver/
32. CCN, “Silver $130 vs $71 Physical Repricing: Banks Collapse Bitcoin Crash,” January 2026 – https://www.ccn.com/education/crypto/silver-130-vs-71-physical-repricing-banks-collapse-bitcoin-crash/